Polar OH1 vs Wahoo TICKR Fit - Where are the differences?

Let's take the heart rate sensors Polar OH1* and Wahoo TICKR Fit* in the comparison and look at the differences more closely.

Heart rate measurement

In both cases we have an optical measurement. This technology is considered less accurate than the ECG technology, which usually comes in combination with the chest measurement.

With both devices the sensor is worn on the arm. This occurs most often with optical sensors.

Connection options

Bluetooth has become a very popular option for connecting heart rate sensors and pulse belts. Both the Polar OH1 and the Wahoo TICKR Fit offer this. The connection via Bluetooth is mostly used for cell phones or fitness watches. Some new devices in fitness studios also offer Bluetooth as an option.

The standard ANT+ less known. However, it is often used in the field of sports. Some finte watches, especially from Garmin and Polar, support the form of the connection. In comparison between the Polar OH1 and the Wahoo TICKR Fit you get ANT+ with both.

You have to do without 5kHz, also known as Gymlink, for both heart rate sensors. The 5kHz is, as Gymlink says, mostly used for equipment in the gym. These include, for example, treadmills or bicycle ergometers.

Waterproof

Both heart rate sensors from the comparison are waterproof. The Polar OH1 can be used up to 30 m under water. The Wahoo TICKR Fit can be submerged up to 30 m under water.

Belt

Most heart rate sensors can be adjusted in size. This is especially relevant for chest straps.