Garmin HRM-Tri vs Wahoo TICKR Fit - Where are the differences?
Where are the differences?
Let's take the heart rate sensors Garmin HRM-Tri* and Wahoo TICKR Fit* in the comparison and look at the differences more closely.
Heart rate measurement
Garmin HRM-Tri works with a EKG measurement. For the Wahoo TICKR Fit rely on the Optical technology. In general the measurement via ECG is considered more accurate. Thus the Garmin HRM-Tri* is equipped with the more accurate technology.
With the Garmin HRM-Tri the measurement is taken across the chest. This is a chest belt. The Wahoo TICKR Fit is worn on the arm.
Connection options
Bluetooth has become a very popular option for connecting heart rate sensors and pulse belts. This is where the conventional heart rate sensors differ. In contrast to the Garmin HRM-Tri, the Wahoo TICKR Fit offers Bluetooth as connection possibility. The connection via Bluetooth is mostly used for cell phones or fitness watches. Some new devices in fitness studios also offer Bluetooth as an option.
The standard ANT+ less known. However, it is often used in the field of sports. Some finte watches, especially from Garmin and Polar, support the form of the connection. In comparison between the Garmin HRM-Tri and the Wahoo TICKR Fit you get ANT+ with both.
Waterproof
Both heart rate sensors from the comparison are waterproof. The Garmin HRM-Tri can be used up to 50 m under water. The Wahoo TICKR Fit can be submerged up to 50 m under water.
Belt
Most heart rate sensors can be adjusted in size. This is especially relevant for chest straps. The minimum belt length of the Garmin HRM-Tri is 60,0 cm. The maximum length for the Garmin HRM-Tri is 142,0 cm.