Anker PowerConf C200 vs Razer Kiyo - Where are the differences?

Brand
Anker
Razer
Product name
PowerConf C200
Kiyo
Show all
Only differences
Resolution & Image
Maximum resolution
Maximum resolution
2K
Maximum resolution
FullHD
Maximum resolution
Maximum resolution
2048 x 1080 px
Maximum resolution
1920 x 1080 px
Maximum frame rate
Maximum frame rate
-
Maximum frame rate
60 fps
Frame rate 1080p
Frame rate 1080p
-
Frame rate 1080p
30 fps
Frame rate 720p
Frame rate 720p
-
Frame rate 720p
60 fps
Field of view
Adjustable
Adjustable
Yes
Adjustable
-
Max.
Max.
95 °
Max.
81 °
Options
Options
  • 65°
  • 78°
  • 95°
Options
  • 81.6°
Functions
Autofocus
Autofocus
Yes
Autofocus
Yes
360° swivel
360° swivel
No
360° swivel
No
Microphone
Available
Available
Yes
Available
Yes
Equipment
Cover aperture
Cover aperture
Yes
Cover aperture
No
Tripod thread
Tripod thread
-
Tripod thread
No
Specifications
Cable length
Cable length
-
Cable length
1,5 m

Where are the differences?

Let's compare the two webcams Anker PowerConf C200* and Razer Kiyo* a little closer and take a look at the differences. The Anker PowerConf C200 is from the year 2021 and thus newer. The Razer Kiyo was launched in the year 2017.

Which webcam has the higher resolution?

The resolution is one of the most important factors for a webcam and therefore elementary for the purchase decision. The two webcams Anker PowerConf C200 and Razer Kiyo do not differ at this point. Both provide a maximum resolution of 2048 x 1080 px (2K). The resolution and frame rate factors are often also a reason why an external webcam is worthwhile. With most built-in webcams in notebooks, the resolution and frame rate is quite low.

Which webcam gives the better frame rate?

This brings us to the next important factor: the frame rate, or fps (frames per second). This specification describes how many frames per second can be recorded and played back. The higher the value, the smoother the picture runs.

However, the frame rate often varies depending on the resolution. Some devices have a higher framerate at a lower resolution. This is also the case here. At the top of the table you can find the resolutions with the corresponding framerate.

Field of view

The larger the field of view, the more of the environment a webcam can capture. However, a larger field of view is not necessarily better, as it can also capture more privacy. This is where the two webcams differed. The maximum field of view of the Anker PowerConf C200 is larger with 95 ° in comparison. The Razer Kiyo has a maximum field of view of 81 °. The Anker PowerConf C200* has the advantage that the viewing area can be adjusted. This of course gives more flexibility in the application.

Is there a microphone installed?

With most webcams, there is an integrated microphone. For streaming or when no headset is available, this is beneficial. Both the Anker PowerConf C200 and the Razer Kiyo offer an integrated microphone. In both cases, it is an recording.

Cover panel

Some webcams have a cover bezel built in. This is only the case with the Anker PowerConf C200*. With the Razer Kiyo you have to do without this feature. The bezel protects the lens, but also provides privacy protection. Most of the time, the cover bezel is advertised for privacy. Of course, for some models, there are also additional options to cover the lens.

Relevant comparisons